AVERAGE ENERGY SAVING
60%
AVERAGE RETURN ON INVESTMENT
3 Years
REDUCTION OF MAINTENANCE COST
250%

Emergency Lighting in Critical Spaces: A Guide to High Risk Area Lighting

Introduction: why high risk emergency lighting is widely misunderstood

 

Emergency lighting is most often associated with escape routes and exit signage. While that focus is essential, it does not address every risk present in a building. In some spaces, a sudden loss of light creates an immediate danger rather than a simple evacuation challenge. These spaces are high risk task areas, and they require a higher standard of emergency lighting.

Emergency lighting for high risk areas is frequently misunderstood because it looks compliant at a glance. Luminaires are installed, tests are recorded, and escape routes are illuminated. What is often missing is sufficient light at the point where hazardous tasks must be made safe before evacuation can occur. Escape lighting is not designed to illuminate machinery, tools, or control interfaces to a usable level.

This misunderstanding appears across many sectors, from schools and hospitals to industrial environments. When lighting fails, the first moments matter most. Without adequate emergency illumination, operators may be unable to shut down equipment safely, increasing the risk of injury before evacuation even begins.

What this article covers and who it is for

 

This article explains what high risk task area lighting is and how it differs from standard emergency escape lighting. It sets out how high risk areas are identified, the core lighting requirements that apply, and why these requirements are often missed in real buildings. It also explores common applications, system design challenges, and compliance considerations.

The content is intended for building owners, responsible persons, facilities managers, consultants, and project teams involved in non-domestic buildings. It is written to support practical decision-making, particularly when reviewing emergency lighting designs, fire risk assessments, or refurbishment plans where hazardous tasks are present.

What counts as a high risk task area

 

A high risk task area is a location where the sudden loss of lighting could expose people to harm and where sufficient emergency illumination is required to allow a task to be made safe before evacuation. The classification is not based on room type alone, but on what activities take place and the consequences of lighting failure.

Typical risk factors include moving machinery, sharp tools, press equipment, rotating components, high temperatures, hazardous substances, or electrical testing. In these environments, operators may need to isolate power, shut down equipment, or stabilise a process before leaving the area. Visibility of emergency stop buttons and the nearest point of isolation is therefore critical.

Identification of high risk task areas relies on emergency lighting risk assessment. This assessment should consider the task being performed, proximity to hazards, the people involved, and the likelihood of confusion or error if lighting fails. It should also account for whether occupants are familiar with the space and whether stress or time pressure could increase risk.

High risk task area lighting is often discussed alongside local area lighting because the requirement is focused and task-specific rather than general. Its purpose is not to allow work to continue, but to protect people by enabling safe shutdown and controlled movement away from danger.

Where buildings commonly fall short

 

One of the most common shortcomings is the assumption that emergency escape lighting automatically addresses all safety risks. In many buildings, emergency luminaires are installed to meet escape route requirements, but no consideration is given to whether hazardous tasks can actually be made safe when normal lighting fails. This results in systems that appear compliant but fail in practice.

Another frequent issue is poor alignment between risk assessment and lighting design. High risk tasks may be identified in principle, but the emergency lighting layout is not adapted to reflect them. As a result, light levels may be adequate at floor level while work surfaces, machinery controls, or isolation points remain poorly illuminated.

Emergency stop button lighting is a particular weakness. Emergency stop devices are often located on machinery, walls, or control panels that fall outside standard escape lighting zones. If these points are not specifically illuminated under emergency conditions, operators may struggle to locate or operate them quickly, increasing the risk of secondary incidents.

Value engineering also plays a role. Emergency lighting is sometimes reduced late in a project to save cost, without reassessing the impact on high risk task areas. Over time, changes to layouts, equipment, or processes can further erode compliance if lighting strategies are not reviewed. These issues are rarely obvious until a power failure or inspection exposes them.

The core requirements explained with real numbers

 

High risk task area lighting is governed by specific quantitative requirements that go well beyond those for standard emergency escape lighting. These requirements are set out within the UK emergency lighting British standard framework, most notably BS 5266-1, and they are frequently misunderstood in practice.

The central requirement is that emergency lighting in high risk task areas must provide at least 10 percent of the normal lighting level required for the task being carried out. This is commonly referred to as the 10 percent rule. Alongside this, there is an absolute minimum requirement of 15 lux, but in most environments where hazardous tasks are performed, the percentage-based requirement is the controlling factor.

Emergency lighting lux levels must be assessed at the task plane rather than at floor level. This distinction is critical. For example, if a workspace is designed to operate at 500 lux under normal conditions, the emergency lighting must deliver a minimum of 50 lux to the relevant work surface during a power failure. That level of illumination is necessary to allow operators to see hazards clearly, locate controls accurately, and complete shutdown procedures without error.

These figures help explain why many installations that appear compliant fall short when measured. Emergency lighting layouts are often designed around escape routes, with luminaires positioned and spaced to achieve minimum floor-level illuminance. When those same fittings are expected to provide task-level lighting, performance is frequently inadequate.

The challenge is compounded by system limitations. Self contained emergency luminaires may struggle to deliver higher output levels, particularly over time as batteries age and light sources depreciate. Without careful design and verification, the assumed emergency lighting performance may bear little resemblance to actual conditions during a power failure.

The detailed definitions, illuminance requirements, and performance criteria that underpin these calculations are set out across the relevant emergency lighting British Standards, which provide the accepted benchmark for demonstrating compliance and managing risk in high risk task areas.

Why 0.5 seconds matters in high risk environments

 

In high risk task areas, how quickly emergency lighting activates is just as important as how bright it is. The standard requires that emergency lighting in these areas activates within 0.5 seconds of a failure of the normal supply.

This requirement recognises that danger exists immediately when lighting is lost. Operators may be using rotating machinery, handling hazardous materials, or working close to moving parts. Even a brief delay can result in loss of control, misjudgement, or physical injury before the person has time to react.

Emergency lighting 0.5 seconds is therefore not a comfort-based requirement. It is a safety-critical response time designed to prevent escalation of risk in the first moments after a power failure. This is particularly relevant where tasks require fine motor control or precise interaction with equipment.

Unlike standard escape lighting, where short delays may be acceptable, high risk task area lighting must respond almost instantaneously. This has implications for system design, control integration, and commissioning. Designers must ensure that switching arrangements, control gear, and power supplies do not introduce delays that undermine the intent of the requirement.

High risk areas by sector: where this applies in practice

 

High risk task area lighting is not limited to specialist industrial sites. It appears across a wide range of sectors, often in spaces that are occupied daily but rarely reviewed in detail from an emergency lighting perspective.

In schools, high risk task area lighting commonly applies in design and technology rooms, woodwork workshops, and science laboratories. These spaces often contain sharp tools, rotating equipment, heat sources, or chemicals that require controlled shutdown before evacuation. Students and staff may be working close to hazards, making immediate visibility essential if normal lighting fails.

Hospitals and healthcare environments introduce different but equally significant risks. Treatment rooms, theatres, plant areas, and clinical support spaces may contain equipment that must be stabilised or isolated before staff can safely move away. In these settings, emergency lighting must support safe decision-making under pressure, often where patients or vulnerable occupants are present.

Industrial environments provide the most obvious examples. Production lines, saw mills, tool rooms, machine presses, and processing areas frequently involve moving parts and high-energy processes. High risk task area lighting in industrial settings must allow operators to locate controls, isolate power, and avoid secondary hazards immediately following a power failure. Familiarity with the environment does not remove the risk created by sudden darkness.

System design challenges and technology choices

 

Meeting the requirements for high risk task area lighting presents distinct design challenges, particularly where higher illuminance levels and rapid activation times are required. Systems that perform adequately for escape lighting may struggle to meet these demands without careful planning.

Self contained emergency lighting is widely used because it is flexible and relatively simple to install. However, self contained emergency lighting often relies on individual batteries that limit output and duration. Achieving higher task-level illuminance can require additional fittings or specialist luminaires, and performance can degrade over time as batteries age and light sources depreciate.

These limitations do not make self contained systems unsuitable, but they do require realistic assessment. Designers must consider whether the required light levels can be achieved at the task plane, not just assumed based on catalogue data or spacing rules.

In larger or more complex environments, a central battery emergency lighting system may offer advantages. Central battery systems can deliver higher and more consistent output, and in some configurations can maintain full output from general luminaires during emergency conditions. This can be particularly beneficial where tasks demand higher illuminance or where uniformity and reliability are critical.

System choice should always follow risk assessment rather than cost alone. Factors such as maintenance strategy, testing regime, environmental conditions, and long-term reliability all influence whether a self contained or central battery approach is appropriate for a given high risk area.

Design, verification, and compliance in practice

 

High risk task area lighting must be identified early and addressed through a coordinated design process. Risk assessment should inform where enhanced emergency lighting is required, while lighting calculations should confirm that illuminance levels and response times meet the standard in practice.

Verification is essential. It is not enough to assume that emergency lighting will perform as intended. Verification should confirm that luminaires activate within the required timeframe, that task-level illuminance is achieved, and that emergency stop buttons and isolation points are clearly visible under emergency conditions. Documentation of these checks is critical for demonstrating due diligence.

Ongoing compliance depends on structured testing, clear records, and periodic review. Changes to layouts, equipment, or processes can introduce new risks if emergency lighting strategies are not revisited. A managed approach to emergency lighting compliance helps responsible persons maintain confidence that systems remain suitable over time.

Routine inspections and functional checks form part of this process, alongside longer-term verification. Understanding current emergency lighting testing requirements supports effective maintenance planning and reduces the risk of issues being identified only during an incident or enforcement action.

Why you can trust Connected Light

 

Connected Light is an independent lighting consultancy focused on safety-critical and compliance-led environments, with extensive experience in the design and verification of emergency lighting systems. The team works closely with building owners and responsible persons to ensure that emergency lighting strategies are based on real risk rather than assumptions.

A key part of this approach is staying aligned with evolving standards, including the changes introduced by the BS 5266-1:2025 update. These updates place greater emphasis on performance, documentation, and accountability, particularly in complex buildings where high risk task areas exist.

Connected Light holds BAFE emergency lighting certification, providing third-party audited assurance that emergency lighting services meet recognised industry benchmarks. This certification supports duty holders in demonstrating due diligence and competence. The consultancy also provides clear guidance on regulatory changes, including a detailed overview of BS 5266-1:2025 explained for building owners and estates teams.

Conclusion: Reducing risk in critical spaces

 

Emergency lighting for high risk areas plays a critical role in protecting people where hazardous tasks cannot simply stop when power fails. Without adequate illumination, even well-managed buildings can expose occupants to unnecessary risk in the first moments of an incident.

By identifying high risk task areas early, applying the correct standards, and verifying performance in practice, organisations can move beyond surface-level compliance. Specialist support from Connected Light helps ensure emergency lighting strategies genuinely reduce risk in critical spaces rather than merely appearing compliant.

Related Articles

I have been a customer of Connected Light for over 15 years, they have worked on several large projects providing design and installation with great results and huge energy savings.... Read More

Barry Saunders - St Monica’s Trust -

The service Connected Light offer to us is invaluable. They have access to a wide range of manufacturers and luminaires that enhance any lighting design, provide the back-up calculations, control philosophy and on-site commissioning.... Read More

Nick Hare - Director of Electrical Services - Brunel Integrated Services Ltd -

I've been a Client of Connected Light when working as a Project Manager for two NHS Trusts in Bristol over the past three years. Every interaction with Matt and the wider team at the company is a positive one... Read More

James Day - Project Manager - Multiple NHS Trusts -

AVERAGE ENERGY SAVING
60%
AVERAGE RETURN ON INVESTMENT
3 Years
REDUCTION OF MAINTENANCE COST
250%

BS 5266-1:2025 Explained: What the New Emergency Lighting Standard Means for Building Owners

Introduction: why BS 5266-1:2025 matters now

The publication of BS 5266-1:2025 marks a significant moment for emergency lighting in the UK. Rather than a routine update, the revised standard reflects a broader shift in how life safety systems are expected to perform in modern buildings. As layouts become more complex and evacuation strategies more varied, emergency lighting is no longer viewed as a passive fallback but as an active part of building safety management.

For building owners and responsible persons, BS 5266-1:2025 raises the bar on clarity, consistency, and accountability. It strengthens expectations around how systems are designed, verified, and maintained over time, aligning emergency lighting more closely with real-world risk rather than historic assumptions. This matters not only for compliance, but for demonstrating due diligence in the event of inspection, audit, or incident.

Understanding what has changed, and why, is now essential. Organisations that continue to rely on outdated interpretations risk falling behind current best practice, increasing both safety exposure and regulatory risk as enforcement expectations evolve.

What is BS 5266-1:2025?

BS 5266-1:2025 is the latest edition of the UK code of practice for the emergency lighting of premises. It sets out recommendations for the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of emergency lighting systems to support safe evacuation, occupant protection, and continuity of critical activities during a loss of normal lighting.

The standard applies to most non-domestic buildings and communal areas, covering a wide range of environments from offices and retail premises to healthcare, education, and transport-related facilities. It provides a structured framework for assessing risk, determining appropriate lighting provision, and ensuring systems perform as intended throughout their lifecycle.

BS 5266-1:2025 is published by the British Standards Institution, whose role is to develop consensus-based standards that reflect legislation, European alignment, and practical industry experience. As the British Standards Institution explains, the 2025 revision expands the scope of emergency lighting, strengthens guidance on verification and documentation, and supports a more consistent approach to safety across different building types.

By following BS 5266-1:2025, organisations are better placed to align emergency lighting provision with UK fire safety expectations, demonstrating that systems have been designed and managed in line with current, recognised best practice.

Why BS 5266-1 was updated in 2025

The update to BS 5266-1 reflects how buildings, risks, and operational expectations have changed over time. Many modern premises are now multi-use, densely occupied, or reliant on progressive evacuation and stay-put strategies rather than simple full evacuation scenarios. Emergency lighting guidance needed to evolve to reflect these realities.

Another key driver was alignment with updated European standards, particularly EN 1838:2024 and EN 50172:2024. These standards place greater emphasis on photometric performance, verification, and consistency in how emergency lighting is measured and maintained. Bringing BS 5266-1 into closer alignment reduces ambiguity for designers, installers, and duty holders, and supports more predictable system performance.

Practical industry experience has also played a significant role. Issues such as battery degradation, circuit vulnerability, and inconsistent record keeping have highlighted gaps between theoretical compliance and real-world performance. The 2025 revision responds by reinforcing expectations around testing regimes, documentation, and system resilience.

This shift places greater importance on competence and governance. Independent assessment and third-party certification have become increasingly relevant as a way to demonstrate that emergency lighting systems are not only installed, but designed and managed by appropriately qualified professionals. Connected Light’s achievement of BAFE SP203-4 certification is one example of how third-party oversight supports the intent of BS 5266-1:2025 by providing audited assurance of competence, process, and compliance.

Scope expansion: escape lighting, local area lighting, standby lighting

One of the most important changes in BS 5266-1:2025 is the formal expansion of scope beyond emergency escape lighting alone. Earlier editions were primarily interpreted around evacuation scenarios, often leaving other forms of emergency illumination inconsistently specified or justified through risk assessment. The 2025 revision removes this ambiguity by clearly defining three distinct emergency lighting purposes.

Emergency escape lighting remains the foundation of the standard. Its role is to illuminate escape routes, exits, and key safety features so occupants can leave a building safely during an emergency. This includes corridors, stairways, changes in floor level, and final exits. In practice, escape lighting is the aspect most frequently scrutinised during inspections, which is why many organisations now rely on structured emergency lighting compliance frameworks rather than informal maintenance approaches.

Local area lighting is now explicitly recognised as a separate requirement. This form of lighting supports the safe shutdown of hazardous activities before evacuation can occur. Typical examples include plant rooms, control panels, laboratories, workshops, and areas containing moving machinery. The inclusion of local area lighting reflects the reality that immediate evacuation is not always the safest option, particularly in complex operational environments.

Standby lighting completes the expanded scope. Unlike escape lighting, standby lighting is designed to allow normal activities to continue during a loss of mains power. This is particularly relevant in healthcare, transport, data centres, and certain industrial environments where occupants may be required to remain in place. In these settings, emergency lighting strategies are increasingly delivered under independently verified frameworks such as BAFE-certified emergency lighting services to provide assurance around system intent and performance.

Key technical and compliance changes introduced

BS 5266-1:2025 introduces a series of technical and compliance changes that go beyond simple clarification. These updates directly affect how emergency lighting systems are designed, tested, verified, and documented.

Circuit integrity and resilience are given significantly greater emphasis. The revised standard reinforces expectations around fault tolerance, particularly in higher-risk environments, to prevent single electrical failures from disabling large sections of emergency lighting. This has implications for circuit layout, luminaire grouping, and the way systems are assessed during verification.

Escape route illuminance guidance has also evolved. Alignment with updated European standards places greater focus on achieving compliant light levels across the full width of escape routes rather than relying solely on centre-line measurements. This change increases the importance of accurate design calculations and post-installation validation, particularly where layouts or fittings have changed since installation.

Photometric verification is now more clearly embedded within long-term compliance expectations. The standard strengthens alignment with BS EN 50172 by reinforcing the need to verify that emergency lighting continues to deliver the illuminance levels originally specified. This reinforces the shift away from assumption-based compliance toward measured verification, a process increasingly delivered through structured emergency lighting compliance services.

Documentation and handover requirements have also been clarified. The revised structure places greater importance on clear records covering design intent, testing regimes, verification results, and remedial actions. These records are particularly important where competence and governance are demonstrated through third-party oversight, such as projects delivered under BAFE SP203-4 certification.

What BS 5266-1:2025 means for building owners and responsible persons

For building owners and responsible persons, BS 5266-1:2025 represents a material shift in how emergency lighting compliance is judged. Systems are no longer assessed purely on whether luminaires operate during a power failure, but on whether performance can be demonstrated against current standards.

Legal and reputational exposure increases where organisations continue to rely on assumptions based on older editions of the standard. During audits, enforcement action, or post-incident investigations, emergency lighting is increasingly evaluated against BS 5266-1:2025 expectations, not historic benchmarks. This makes proactive review essential, particularly where buildings have undergone refurbishment, changes in use, or occupancy profile.

Evidence-based compliance is now central. Clear documentation covering surveys, testing, photometric verification, and corrective actions provides defensible proof that duties have been met. Many organisations now formalise this approach through BAFE-certified emergency lighting verification and certification rather than relying on fragmented maintenance records.

There is also a governance dimension. Organisations responsible for public, educational, healthcare, or critical infrastructure environments face heightened scrutiny from regulators and insurers. Demonstrating alignment with BS 5266-1:2025 through structured emergency lighting compliance support provides confidence that responsibilities are being managed competently, consistently, and in line with current expectations.

What organisations should review following the update

The introduction of BS 5266-1:2025 makes this an appropriate point for organisations to step back and review their existing emergency lighting arrangements. The update is not intended to force immediate replacement of systems, but it does raise expectations around how suitability and performance are demonstrated.

Emergency lighting strategies should be reviewed first. This includes confirming that escape lighting, local area lighting, and standby lighting have all been considered where relevant, rather than assuming evacuation is the only credible scenario. Buildings that support complex operations or vulnerable occupants are particularly affected by this broader scope.

Risk assessments should also be revisited. Changes in layout, occupancy, or use may mean that earlier assessments no longer reflect real conditions. The updated standard reinforces the role of risk assessment as the foundation for design decisions, rather than a one-off exercise.

Verification cycles are another key consideration. Photometric verification expectations are now clearer and more prominent, meaning organisations should understand when their systems were last verified and when repeat verification is due. Testing regimes and documentation should be reviewed at the same time to ensure records are complete, accurate, and auditable.

Finally, organisations should consider the competence and governance of their service providers. Demonstrating compliance increasingly depends on independent evidence, clear records, and recognised certification rather than informal assurances.

FAQs: BS 5266-1:2025 and emergency lighting standards

What is BS 5266-1:2025 and when did it come into effect?
BS 5266-1:2025 is the latest edition of the British Standard that provides guidance on the design, installation, testing, and maintenance of emergency lighting in non-domestic premises. It was published in late 2025 and replaces the previous 2016 edition.

Is BS 5266-1:2025 a legal requirement in the UK?
British Standards are not legislation in themselves. However, BS 5266-1:2025 is widely recognised as the accepted benchmark for demonstrating compliance with UK fire safety duties. In practice, regulators, insurers, and courts often expect systems to align with the latest published standard.

How does BS 5266-1:2025 differ from BS 5266-1:2016?
The most significant difference is the expanded scope. The 2025 edition formally includes local area lighting and standby lighting alongside emergency escape lighting. It also provides clearer expectations around resilience, verification, documentation, and alignment with updated European standards.

Does BS 5266-1:2025 change emergency lighting testing requirements?
Routine monthly functional testing and annual full-duration testing remain fundamental. However, the updated standard places greater emphasis on how results are recorded, how tests are managed to avoid gaps in protection, and how performance is demonstrated over time.

What does the new standard say about photometric verification?
BS 5266-1:2025 reinforces alignment with BS EN 50172 by clarifying expectations around photometric verification. Systems should be verified initially and re-verified at defined intervals to confirm that required illuminance levels are still being achieved, rather than assumed.

Who is responsible for compliance with BS 5266-1:2025?
Responsibility sits with the building owner or the person in control of the premises, often referred to as the responsible person. This includes ensuring that systems are suitable, maintained, tested, and supported by appropriate documentation.

Do existing buildings need to be upgraded immediately?
Not necessarily. Existing systems do not automatically become non-compliant overnight. However, organisations should review their arrangements against the updated standard and address any gaps through planned improvements rather than waiting for enforcement or incident-driven scrutiny.

Summary: aligning with BS 5266-1:2025

BS 5266-1:2025 marks a clear shift in how emergency lighting is expected to be managed. The standard focuses on demonstrated performance, resilience, and evidence-based compliance rather than assumption. For organisations responsible for people and premises, now is the right moment to review strategies, documentation, and verification arrangements to ensure they remain aligned with current expectations rather than historic practice.

Why you can trust Connected Light

Connected Light operates as an independent lighting consultancy with a strong focus on governance, verification, and long-term compliance. The team works across emergency lighting design, testing, photometric verification, and certification, supporting organisations through every stage of the compliance lifecycle.

As a provider of BAFE-certified emergency lighting services, Connected Light offers third-party audited assurance that systems meet recognised industry standards. This includes expertise across BS 5266-1:2025, BS EN 1838, and BS EN 50172.

With more than 40 years of combined experience, the consultancy supports clients through surveys, verification programmes, certification, and advisory services, helping responsible persons demonstrate compliance clearly, confidently, and defensibly through structured emergency lighting compliance support.

Related Articles

As a valued partner, Connected Light has consistently demonstrated their commitment to delivering sizable projects of lighting controls into various industries, including blue chip clients, retail, and hospitality.... Read More

Owen Basara-Hamilton - UK Sales Manager - Casambi Technologies OY -

I have recently been working with Connected Light on a number of Lifecycle projects in the education sector and they have been great to work with, from conception and scoping works through to the delivery and installation.... Read More

Dani Timbrell - Facilities Management Project Manager -

The service Connected Light offer to us is invaluable. They have access to a wide range of manufacturers and luminaires that enhance any lighting design, provide the back-up calculations, control philosophy and on-site commissioning.... Read More

Nick Hare - Director of Electrical Services - Brunel Integrated Services Ltd -

AVERAGE ENERGY SAVING
60%
AVERAGE RETURN ON INVESTMENT
3 Years
REDUCTION OF MAINTENANCE COST
250%

Workplace Lighting Regulations 2026 - Everything You Need to Know

Workplace lighting regulations are becoming increasingly significant for building owners and facility managers as 2026 approaches. Updates to British Standards, greater scrutiny around health and safety, and rising expectations for energy efficiency and sustainability mean lighting can no longer be treated as a secondary building consideration. It plays a direct role in compliance, operational performance, and risk management.

Across the UK, employers and duty holders are legally required to provide lighting that supports safe movement, clear visibility, and effective task performance. Poorly designed or outdated lighting can contribute to accidents, visual fatigue, reduced concentration, and long-term discomfort. These issues not only affect wellbeing and productivity but also increase exposure to enforcement action and liability.

At the same time, evolving guidance around glare control, emergency lighting, smart controls, and product sustainability is prompting many organisations to review existing installations rather than rely on legacy systems. As an established UK lighting consultancy, Connected Light supports building owners and facilities teams by translating complex regulatory requirements into practical, future-ready lighting strategies that remain compliant well beyond 2026.

The legal baseline: “suitable and sufficient lighting” explained

The core legal requirement for workplace lighting in the UK is set out in Regulation 8 of the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992. This regulation states that every workplace must have suitable and sufficient lighting and that, where reasonably practicable, this should be provided by natural light. It also requires suitable emergency lighting wherever people may be exposed to danger if normal lighting fails.

Although the regulation itself is deliberately broad, it places a clear duty on employers, building owners, and those in control of non-domestic premises. Lighting must allow people to work safely, move around without risk, and carry out tasks without undue visual strain. What is considered suitable and sufficient depends on the nature of the work, the environment, and the hazards present.

Further clarity is provided by guidance from the Health and Safety Executive. The HSE’s guidance on lighting and human factors explains how lighting affects safety, performance, and wellbeing in the workplace, highlighting the importance of appropriate light levels, glare control, colour, contrast, and uniformity. Lighting that technically illuminates a space but causes glare, deep shadowing, or discomfort may still fall short of legal expectations. You can read this guidance directly on the Health and Safety Executive website: HSE lighting and human factors guidance.

Importantly, this duty is ongoing rather than a one-off design consideration. Duty holders are expected to maintain lighting systems, review them when work activities change, and reassess adequacy during refurbishments, layout changes, or shifts in building use. This legal baseline underpins all other workplace lighting regulations and standards in the UK, making it the starting point for any compliant lighting strategy.

Task-based lighting and lux levels: what the HSE expects

A fundamental principle of workplace lighting guidance is that different tasks require different levels of illumination. There is no single lux value that applies to every environment. Instead, lighting should be designed around the activities being carried out and the visual demands placed on occupants.

The Health and Safety Executive publication Lighting at Work (HSG38) explains how illuminance levels should be matched to task complexity. For example, a corridor or walkway may only require relatively low light levels to allow safe movement, while office environments typically require higher illuminance to support screen-based tasks. More visually demanding activities, such as reading detailed drawings or working in control rooms, often require significantly higher light levels to maintain accuracy and reduce fatigue.

This task-based approach is reflected in practical guidance used by large institutions. The University of Warwick’s office lighting guidance sets out typical lux levels for different types of office work, including around 300 lux for mainly screen-based tasks and 500 lux for paper-based activities. It also emphasises the importance of glare control, reflections, and the careful use of local task lighting where required.

HSG38 further highlights the value of user control. In spaces where multiple activities take place, relying solely on uniform general lighting can be inefficient and uncomfortable. Providing desk lamps or localised lighting allows individuals to increase light levels where needed without over-lighting the entire area. Evidence referenced by the HSE shows that giving occupants control over their lighting can improve comfort and reduce stress, particularly in open-plan offices.

In modern workplaces, lighting design must also account for screen use, reflections, and layouts that change over time. This is why task-based assessments sit at the heart of effective office lighting design, rather than being treated as a one-off calculation at the point of installation. Applying these principles helps ensure lighting remains compliant, adaptable, and supportive of everyday working conditions.

Glare, screens and visual comfort: understanding UGR requirements

Glare is one of the most common causes of visual discomfort in workplaces, particularly in offices and control rooms where screens are used for long periods. Even where light levels are technically adequate, poorly controlled brightness and reflections can lead to eye strain, headaches, reduced concentration, and increased fatigue.

The Unified Glare Rating, or UGR, is the recognised method for assessing discomfort glare from lighting installations. It considers factors such as luminaire brightness, size, position, and the reflective properties of surrounding surfaces. Lower UGR values indicate lower levels of glare. In office environments, guidance typically expects a UGR value of less than 19, with similar expectations applying to control rooms and other visually sensitive spaces.

Excessive glare is not just a comfort issue. It can interfere with task performance, increase the likelihood of errors, and contribute to longer-term health concerns. Reflections on screens, high contrast between bright and dark areas, and exposed light sources are all common contributors. These issues often become more pronounced as layouts change, screens are added, or lighting systems age.

Effective glare control requires more than selecting low-glare luminaires. Dimming, scene setting, and intelligent control strategies play an important role in adapting lighting to different tasks and times of day. Modern lighting control systems can help balance light levels, reduce unnecessary brightness, and maintain visual comfort without compromising safety or efficiency. This is where integrated approaches, such as those used in smart lighting control systems, support both compliance and occupant wellbeing by allowing lighting to respond dynamically to how spaces are actually used.

CIBSE and BS EN 12464-1: the UK benchmark for lighting design

While legislation sets the legal baseline for workplace lighting, professional guidance defines what good practice looks like in real terms. In the UK, this guidance is led by the Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers and its Society of Light and Lighting. Their publications provide the framework used by lighting professionals to translate regulatory requirements into effective, practical designs.

BS EN 12464-1 is the key standard for indoor workplace lighting. It sets out recommended illuminance levels, glare limits, colour rendering requirements, and uniformity criteria for a wide range of environments. Rather than prescribing a single solution, it takes a task-based approach that recognises the differing needs of offices, industrial spaces, healthcare settings, and educational buildings.

CIBSE lighting guides, including the SLL Code for Lighting and LG7 for offices, build on this standard by providing detailed design guidance informed by research, technology development, and real-world application. These documents are widely recognised as the benchmark for professional lighting design in the UK.

Connected Light uses CIBSE guidance on every project because it provides a consistent, evidence-based approach to balancing compliance, performance, and occupant comfort. This is particularly important in non-office environments such as warehouses, manufacturing spaces, and production facilities, where visual demands, safety risks, and operating conditions vary significantly. Applying recognised standards across industrial lighting projects helps ensure that lighting schemes go beyond minimum compliance and deliver lighting that is appropriate for the tasks, risks, and long-term use of each space.

Emergency lighting compliance: BS 5266 and fire safety duties

Emergency lighting is a critical life safety system, and its provision is a legal requirement in many non-domestic buildings. Under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, the responsible person must ensure that safe escape routes are available at all times, including during a failure of the normal lighting supply.

BS 5266 provides the primary UK code of practice for emergency lighting. It works alongside BS EN 1838 to define where emergency lighting is required, the minimum illuminance levels that must be achieved, and how systems should be designed, installed, and maintained. After more than 14 years without major revision, BS 5266 has recently been updated, reinforcing expectations around system performance, testing, and documentation.

Compliance does not end at installation. Building owners and duty holders are responsible for ensuring that emergency lighting systems are tested regularly, maintained in working order, and supported by accurate records. Monthly functional tests and annual full-duration tests are typically required, with any defects addressed promptly. Failure to maintain adequate emergency lighting can compromise safe evacuation and expose organisations to enforcement action.

Verification plays an important role in demonstrating compliance. Lux level measurements and surveys provide objective evidence that emergency lighting meets the required standards and performs as intended. Services such as lux level surveys for emergency lighting compliance support building owners by identifying deficiencies, informing remedial works, and providing documented assurance that life safety obligations are being met.

Energy efficiency and Part L: controls are no longer optional

Energy efficiency is now a core requirement of workplace lighting regulations, particularly under Part L of the Building Regulations, which applies to non-domestic buildings. Part L sets out clear expectations around reducing energy use and carbon emissions, and lighting systems are a key contributor to overall building performance.

For most commercial buildings, compliance now depends not only on the efficiency of luminaires but on how lighting is controlled. Daylight harvesting systems automatically reduce artificial lighting when sufficient natural light is available, while occupancy sensors ensure that lighting is only used when spaces are occupied. These approaches reduce wasted energy, extend equipment life, and help demonstrate compliance with Part L targets.

The route to compliance can vary depending on whether a project is a new build or a retrofit. In new buildings, lighting controls are typically designed as part of a coordinated services strategy from the outset. In existing buildings, upgrading controls has historically been more complex, but advances in wireless and modular technology mean that performance improvements can now be achieved with minimal disruption.

As Part L continues to evolve, lighting controls should be viewed as a standard requirement rather than an optional enhancement. Systems such as intelligent lighting control systems allow building owners to meet regulatory expectations while maintaining flexibility, comfort, and long-term operational efficiency.

How Connected Light supports compliant, future-proof lighting

Meeting workplace lighting regulations is rarely about a single decision or product. It requires an informed, independent approach that considers compliance, performance, and long-term adaptability. Connected Light supports building owners and facilities teams by acting as an independent consultancy, focused on delivering solutions that remain robust as standards and expectations evolve.

This support typically begins with surveys and assessments that establish how existing lighting performs against current requirements. From there, lighting design is developed to reflect the specific tasks, risks, and operational needs of each environment. In office settings, this often involves balancing light levels, glare control, and user comfort through office lighting design. In more demanding environments such as warehouses or manufacturing facilities, safety, visibility, and resilience are key drivers within industrial lighting schemes.

Controls are also central to future-proof compliance. Intelligent systems allow lighting to respond to occupancy, daylight, and changing patterns of use, supporting energy targets while maintaining visual comfort. Integrated approaches using smart lighting control systems also support commissioning, testing, and ongoing optimisation rather than static installations.

Beyond initial delivery, Connected Light works with clients to plan upgrades, maintenance, and future changes. This lifecycle-led approach helps ensure lighting systems remain compliant, auditable, and effective over time, building trust through consistency, transparency, and technical expertise.

Conclusion: planning now avoids risk later

Workplace lighting regulations are becoming more demanding, with greater emphasis on safety, energy efficiency, sustainability, and accountability. For building owners, waiting until issues arise increases risk, cost, and disruption.

Planning ahead allows lighting systems to be assessed, upgraded, and managed in a controlled way, ensuring they remain suitable, efficient, and compliant as standards change. By taking a structured, informed approach now, organisations can reduce risk, support occupant wellbeing, and protect long-term building performance well beyond 2026.

Related Articles

Connected Light have always stepped up to the challenges of providing lighting solutions to meet their clients’ needs. Their dedicated team provide sound solutions for all challenging life science and industrial environments.... Read More

UKHSA - senior project management team -

The RUH have a close working relationship with Connected Light, working on many projects, having provided equipment and technological advice for a large £1.4 million upgrade from fluorescent LED across the hospital estate.... Read More

Estates Officer – RUH, Bath -

As a long-standing partner of ConnectedLight, Signify Commercial UKI is proud to be associated with such an adaptable and innovative company. ConnectedLight's expertise in lighting services,... Read More

Ella Stuart - Customer Order Manager - Signify -

AVERAGE ENERGY SAVING
60%
AVERAGE RETURN ON INVESTMENT
3 Years
REDUCTION OF MAINTENANCE COST
250%

Current Emergency Lighting Testing Requirements in the UK

Introduction: why emergency lighting testing matters

Emergency lighting is a life-safety system, not a nice-to-have. When normal lighting fails, emergency luminaires and exit signage help people move safely, avoid hazards, and find escape routes without delay. That is why emergency lighting testing requirements uk matter to building owners and facility managers, even in low-risk, well-managed sites.

Testing is where compliance is proven. A system can look fine day-to-day, but batteries degrade, lamps fail, indicators get missed, and records go incomplete. Regular checks reduce the chance of faults being discovered during a real incident, or during enforcement action. If you are reviewing your arrangements, emergency lighting compliance should be treated as an ongoing duty, not a one-off project.

The legal framework for emergency lighting testing in the UK

Emergency lighting testing sits within UK fire safety law, particularly the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. It places duties on the responsible person to ensure fire precautions are in place, maintained, and suitable for the premises. Emergency escape lighting is one of those precautions where the risk assessment indicates it is required.

The key point for duty holders is that the law sets the obligation, while British Standards set out the commonly accepted way to meet it. In practice, this means your testing regime, maintenance checks, and logbook records should align with the relevant standards, because they provide the benchmark for what “reasonable” looks like.

For a clear overview of design, commissioning, and maintenance responsibilities, the BAFE emergency lighting system guidance is a strong reference point. It reinforces the link between risk assessment, competency, documented evidence, and the expectation that systems are kept in working order, not simply installed and forgotten.

BS 5266:2025 – what has changed and why it matters

BS 5266 has been updated to 2025, and that matters because many sites still rely on legacy assumptions about testing frequency, responsibilities, and documentation. The update reinforces that emergency lighting is not only about having fittings in the right places, but about proving performance through routine inspection, testing, and accurate records.

From a facilities perspective, the risk is not usually that testing never happens. It is that it happens inconsistently, records are incomplete, faults are not closed out quickly, or responsibility is unclear when contractors change. That is where BS 5266 emergency lighting testing becomes a practical management issue as much as a technical one.

Competence and independent assurance also come into sharper focus when standards tighten. If you want to evidence due diligence, third-party certification can help demonstrate that design and handover processes are being audited to an established scheme. This is particularly relevant where you are aligning your approach with Connected Light achieves BAFE SP203-4 Certification, which is designed to evidence competency and quality management for emergency lighting services.

Routine emergency lighting testing requirements

Routine testing is the foundation of emergency lighting compliance and is explicitly expected under British Standards. Emergency lighting monthly testing is designed to identify obvious faults early, while emergency lighting annual test requirements confirm that systems can operate for their full rated duration during a real power failure.

Monthly functional testing involves simulating a mains failure to check that emergency luminaires illuminate correctly, indicator lights operate as expected, and fittings are free from visible damage. These tests are short and do not require full battery discharge, but they play a critical role in identifying failures before they escalate. Each test must be recorded in a logbook, including the date, results, and any defects identified.

Annual testing is more demanding and must confirm that emergency lighting remains illuminated for the full rated duration, typically three hours. Any fitting that fails before the end of the test must be repaired or replaced without delay. Guidance from the Fire Protection Association on how often emergency lighting should be tested reinforces the expectation that both monthly and annual tests form part of a compliant maintenance regime.

Fault management is as important as testing itself. Identified defects should be logged, interim safety measures introduced where necessary, and remedial works completed promptly. While some routine checks may be carried out in-house, annual testing and repairs should be undertaken by a competent person with appropriate knowledge and experience of emergency lighting systems.

Testing methods explained: manual, self-test, monitored systems

There are several recognised emergency lighting testing methods, each with different implications for reliability, disruption, and record keeping. The most appropriate solution depends on the size of the building, its risk profile, and how testing is managed in practice.

Manual testing is the most basic approach and is commonly used in smaller premises. It relies on key switches or test devices to simulate a mains failure, with results recorded manually in a logbook. While simple, this method is labour-intensive and carries a higher risk of missed tests or incomplete records, particularly where responsibility changes or testing is carried out infrequently.

Self-testing luminaires automate routine functional and duration tests within individual fittings. Status indicators show whether tests have passed or failed, reducing reliance on manual testing. However, results still need to be checked and logged, and faults can be overlooked if indicators are not regularly reviewed or understood.

Monitored systems provide centralised oversight of emergency lighting performance. Wired or wireless solutions automatically schedule tests, record results, and report faults, significantly reducing administrative burden. When assessing system selection and suitability, emergency lighting compliance should consider not just installation cost, but long-term reliability, disruption to occupants, and the quality of records that can be produced to demonstrate due diligence.

Photometric verification testing: the critical update many miss

Photometric verification testing is an increasingly important requirement that many building owners are still unaware of. Under BS EN 50172:2024, emergency lighting systems must be verified to confirm that required illuminance levels are being achieved, not just that luminaires are switching on.

Verification must be carried out initially and repeated at intervals not exceeding five years. This represents a significant reduction from the previous ten-year expectation and reflects growing recognition that emergency lighting performance degrades over time. Batteries lose capacity, light sources dim, optics deteriorate, and changes to layouts can reduce effective illumination along escape routes.

Without photometric testing, systems may appear compliant while failing to deliver the minimum light levels required for safe evacuation. This creates a hidden compliance risk, particularly in buildings that have undergone refurbishment or changes in use since installation.

Treating verification as a planned, repeatable process helps building owners demonstrate due diligence and maintain confidence in system performance. Managed services such as BAFE-certified emergency lighting verification provide documented evidence that systems continue to meet required standards and support long-term compliance through measured, auditable results rather than assumption.

Emergency lighting testing across different building types

Emergency lighting testing requirements apply across all non-domestic buildings, but the risk profile and testing priorities vary significantly by sector. In office environments, testing focuses on safe evacuation routes, stairwells, and areas with prolonged screen use, where visual clarity during an outage is critical. Education settings introduce additional considerations around occupancy patterns, safeguarding, and the need to minimise disruption during testing.

In healthcare facilities, emergency lighting supports both evacuation and patient safety, often requiring higher resilience, longer durations, and careful management of high-risk task areas. Industrial buildings present different challenges, with machinery, hazardous processes, and high-risk task lighting that must allow safe shutdown before evacuation.

Retail premises and public-facing spaces, such as retail environments, rely on emergency lighting to prevent panic and manage large numbers of occupants. Historic and listed buildings require sensitive solutions that balance compliance with conservation constraints. In defence and security environments, emergency lighting testing must align with heightened security protocols and operational continuity requirements.

Summary: what building owners must do now

Emergency lighting testing is not optional, and compliance expectations are increasing. Building owners must ensure routine testing is carried out, records are maintained, and systems continue to meet required performance levels, not just basic functionality. With updated standards and reduced verification intervals now in force, proactive planning is essential. Acting early reduces risk, avoids disruption, and ensures emergency lighting systems remain reliable, auditable, and compliant when they are needed most.

Why you can trust Connected Light

Connected Light is an independent lighting consultancy specialising in emergency lighting compliance for complex non-domestic buildings. The team works to the latest requirements of BS 5266 and BS EN 50172, supporting clients with surveys, testing, photometric verification, and certification.

As a BAFE SP203-4 certificated provider, Connected Light offers third-party verified assurance that emergency lighting systems are designed, tested, and verified in line with recognised industry standards. This certification provides building owners with independent proof of competence and due diligence.

With more than 40 years of combined experience, Connected Light supports compliance through a structured, evidence-led approach, covering everything from routine testing to long-term verification strategies. Services delivered through emergency lighting compliance are designed to reduce risk, simplify governance, and provide confidence that systems will perform as required in an emergency.

FAQs: emergency lighting testing requirements UK

Is emergency lighting testing a legal requirement in the UK?
Yes. Emergency lighting is part of a building’s life safety provision and is typically required where occupants could be at risk if normal lighting fails. Fire safety legislation places duties on the responsible person to ensure safe escape routes, and emergency lighting must be maintained so it will operate when needed. Testing is how you demonstrate the system is functional and dependable, rather than assumed to be.

How often must emergency lighting be tested?
As a baseline, emergency lighting is expected to be functionally tested monthly and tested for full rated duration annually. Monthly tests confirm fittings operate on battery supply when the normal supply fails. The annual test confirms the system can run for the required duration, commonly three hours, and that faults are identified and addressed. The exact approach can vary depending on system type, building use, and risk profile.

What is photometric verification testing?
Photometric verification testing confirms the system is achieving the required light levels on escape routes and in relevant areas, rather than simply switching on. It is a measured check of illuminance performance and is especially important because light output can degrade over time due to battery condition, lumen depreciation, optics, dirt build-up, and layout changes. It provides objective evidence that emergency lighting still meets its intended performance.

How often is photometric verification required now?
Photometric verification should be completed at initial verification and then repeated at intervals not exceeding five years to confirm continued compliance. This shorter interval reflects the reality that emergency lighting performance can change materially over time, even where monthly and annual functional testing is being completed. It is particularly important after refurbishments, changes to escape routes, or alterations to the lighting layout.

Who is responsible for emergency lighting testing?
The responsible person, duty holder, or building owner is accountable for ensuring testing is completed, recorded, and acted on. Day-to-day checks may be delegated to facilities teams or nominated staff, but accountability remains with the organisation in control of the premises. Annual testing and specialist verification should be carried out by a competent person with the appropriate knowledge and experience.

What records must be kept for compliance?
You should maintain an emergency lighting logbook that records test dates, results, failures, remedial actions, and confirmation that faults have been resolved. Records should also include key system information such as locations, identifiers for luminaires, maintenance history, and any changes to the installation. Clear, accurate records help demonstrate due diligence during audits and support effective fault management.

Related Articles

Connectedlight have worked for ETS designing and supplying lighting systems that deliver full turnkey projects repeatedly building up a valued trust between the companies.... Read More

Simon Jeanes - Contracts Manager - ETS Group -

The RUH have a close working relationship with Connected Light, working on many projects, having provided equipment and technological advice for a large £1.4 million upgrade from fluorescent LED across the hospital estate.... Read More

Estates Officer – RUH, Bath -

I have been a customer of Connected Light for over 15 years, they have worked on several large projects providing design and installation with great results and huge energy savings.... Read More

Barry Saunders - St Monica’s Trust -

AVERAGE ENERGY SAVING
60%
AVERAGE RETURN ON INVESTMENT
3 Years
REDUCTION OF MAINTENANCE COST
250%

Connected Light Welcomes New Compliance & Business Administrator

Connected Light is pleased to announce the appointment of Liz Hair as our new Compliance & Business Administrator.

Liz brings valuable experience to the role, having previously supported ISO9001 processes and contributed to key areas of business compliance and systems integration. Her knowledge and attention to detail will play an important role in maintaining and strengthening our internal standards as we continue to grow.

“We’re delighted to welcome Liz to the team,” said Connected Light Director,  Matt Holway – “Her expertise in compliance and quality systems will help ensure we maintain best-in-class processes and continue delivering exceptional service to our clients.”

Everyone at Connected Light extends a warm welcome to Liz and wishes her every success in her new role. We look forward to the positive impact she will make as part of our team.

Related Articles

As a valued partner, Connected Light has consistently demonstrated their commitment to delivering sizable projects of lighting controls into various industries, including blue chip clients, retail, and hospitality.... Read More

Owen Basara-Hamilton - UK Sales Manager - Casambi Technologies OY -

We’re proud to collaborate with Connected Light, a team that shares our passion for smart, flexible, and future-ready lighting solutions. Their deep market knowledge and hands-on approach make them a perfect partner to bring the power of Casambi to projects across the UK.... Read More

David Bradshaw - Sales Manager UK - CASAMBI -

The RUH have a close working relationship with Connected Light, working on many projects, having provided equipment and technological advice for a large £1.4 million upgrade from fluorescent LED across the hospital estate.... Read More

Estates Officer – RUH, Bath -

AVERAGE ENERGY SAVING
60%
AVERAGE RETURN ON INVESTMENT
3 Years
REDUCTION OF MAINTENANCE COST
250%

Everything you need to know about BS EN 1838:2024

Why this standard matters now

Emergency lighting only does its job when the rules behind it are understood and applied correctly. BS EN 1838:2024 sets the bar for how bright emergency systems need to be so people can find exits quickly, or continue essential activity safely during a power cut. It is relevant to new projects and to existing buildings that are being refurbished or reviewed. The update clarifies how routes through open areas should be illuminated and strengthens expectations on evidence, which is where clear, auditable measurements come in. You will see the term Lighting Lux Levels throughout this guide because the standard is ultimately about measurable light on floors, signs, and tasks. Used well, BS EN 1838:2024 helps duty holders turn design intent into proven, on site performance that stands up to building control, insurers, and internal audits.

What BS EN 1838:2024 covers – scope and intent

At its heart, BS EN 1838:2024 defines the luminous requirements for two things: emergency escape lighting and standby lighting in locations where the public or workers have access. In practice, that means the standard explains what needs to be illuminated, how brightly, and for how long during loss of normal power. It applies across most UK building types and is designed to work alongside related emergency lighting and testing standards. If you need the formal definition and status, see the BS EN 1838:2024 overview on BSI Knowledge. For day to day use, the key takeaway is this: the standard ties minimum illuminance and uniformity to real spaces such as escape routes, open areas, points of emphasis, and high risk task areas, so designs can be verified in the building rather than only on drawings.

Who the standard is for – roles and responsibilities

BS EN 1838:2024 is written for everyone with a hand in keeping people safe when the lights go out. That includes regulators and local authorities, insurers and safety professionals, developers and responsible persons for premises, facilities managers, electrical and lighting engineers, and the fire services. In practical terms, it gives designers a clear brief, helps contractors deliver the right outcome, and gives duty holders a benchmark for acceptance and re verification.

What changed from 2013 – the headline updates

If you worked with the 2013 edition, the most visible change in BS EN 1838:2024 is the expectation that escape routes are illuminated across their usable width, not just along a centre line. That matters in corridors with alcoves and in open plan spaces where routes flex. The standard also clarifies how to light an escape path that passes through an open area, strengthens guidance around points of emphasis and hazardous locations, and introduces local area lighting for situations where some occupants may remain in the building during a power outage. To get a practitioner’s summary of the updates, see these key updates summarised. BS EN 1838:2024 aligns with the testing and maintenance regime in EN 50172 so that initial acceptance and later checks can be evidenced more consistently. Finally, the new edition explicitly supersedes the 2013 version, confirming which text to follow in design reviews and audits. The SELECT listing confirms it supersedes the 2013 edition. For most projects this will mean revisiting assumptions, updating drawings, and planning for verification at handover so that BS EN 1838:2024 compliance is shown in measurements, not just models.

Lighting Lux Levels and uniformity – what to measure and why

Emergency lighting performance is ultimately about Lighting Lux Levels delivered to the floor, tasks, and signs when mains power fails. BS EN 1838:2024 sets minimum illuminance for escape routes, open areas, and high risk task areas, and it links those minimums to uniformity so that occupants do not encounter bright patches followed by darkness. In practice that means checking the route minimum, the average to minimum ratio, and the vertical illuminance around points of emphasis such as fire alarm call points and manual door releases. For a practical summary of common thresholds, see Philip Payne’s guide to practical thresholds and points of emphasis. Remember that Lighting Lux Levels must be achieved under emergency supply conditions, with the system at its declared duration, and with stray light controlled. Designs that just scrape a minimum often fall short on uniformity once installed, especially after dirt and ageing. Treat the numbers as a baseline, then verify in the real building with a measured grid and a short narrative that explains the conditions under which the readings were taken. This is how BS EN 1838:2024 turns design intent into an auditable result.

Verification and on-site measurements – how compliance is proven

Compliance is proven on site. BS EN 1838:2024 expects an initial acceptance check after installation and a follow up at five years to confirm that maintenance, refits, and control changes have not eroded performance. The most efficient way to manage this is to fold a survey plan into your maintenance strategy and keep calibration certificates with the record set. Start by agreeing spaces and grid density, control for stray light, and let the emergency system stabilise before recording results. Use Class 2 or better meters with photopic accuracy and cosine correction, and document the state of fittings and any obstructions in photos. Because many readers search for Lighting Lux Levels, call out the minimums and uniformity you are testing against, but also explain any tolerances applied. Store the readings, drawings, and actions alongside your logbook so the audit trail is clear. For a broader view of acceptance, periodic checks, and responsibilities, our guide to Emergency Lighting Compliance explains how survey evidence, maintenance, and controls come together to satisfy duty holders, building control, and insurers.

Local area lighting, standby, and adaptive systems

BS EN 1838:2024 recognises that not every incident calls for immediate evacuation. It introduces clearer guidance on local area lighting for situations where a risk assessment allows some occupants to remain temporarily during a power outage. In simple terms, local areas must meet at least the same illuminance as the applicable escape route or open area criteria, reach 50 percent light within 5 seconds and full output within 60 seconds, and run for the declared duration. Standby lighting is different again. It supports the continuation of normal activities, but never replaces escape lighting, which must still meet its full requirements. The standard also signposts adaptive emergency escape lighting techniques, which can help direct people away from blocked routes or hazards. Used together, these provisions make BS EN 1838:2024 a practical framework for safe movement, safe waiting, and controlled shutdown where needed.

Where BS EN 1838:2024 meets building control and resident safety

Standards do not exist in a vacuum. Responsible persons and building control teams expect clear, auditable evidence that emergency lighting will work as intended. For residential settings, practical fire safety guidance such as the GOV.UK resource on making your small block of flats safe from fire helps duty holders connect system performance to real evacuation needs. In parallel, the Building Safety Regulator has raised expectations for documentation quality, and industry case material, like the Fire Protection Association’s BSR case study on building control, underlines why measured results, calibration references, and clear drawings matter. Aligning BS EN 1838:2024 outcomes with this wider landscape makes approvals smoother and gives residents, staff, and visitors greater confidence in the building.

How Connected Light helps

We translate the standard into clear steps you can deliver on site. That means design advice where needed, independent lux level surveys with calibrated Class 2 instruments, documented grid measurements, and a prioritised actions list to close any gaps. If remedials are required, our controls and commissioning team can implement fixes and re test through our turn-key project solutions. The result is a single, traceable pack that shows how your building meets BS EN 1838:2024 today and how it will remain compliant at the five year check.

Key takeaways and next steps

The latest emergency lighting rules place more emphasis on proving real performance in your building, not just on paper. Focus on measurable illuminance and uniformity in the right spaces, document on site conditions, and keep calibration evidence with your records. Plan for acceptance checks after installation and put a reminder in your maintenance schedule for the five year re verification. If your team needs help translating the clauses into testing steps, we can align your design, controls, and survey plan so evidence is ready for duty holders, building control, and insurers.

Have questions about compliance, measurement methods, or reporting? Talk to us about a survey or a design review, or book a combined verification and remedials pathway through our turn-key project solutions.

Related Articles

As a valued partner, Connected Light has consistently demonstrated their commitment to delivering sizable projects of lighting controls into various industries, including blue chip clients, retail, and hospitality.... Read More

Owen Basara-Hamilton - UK Sales Manager - Casambi Technologies OY -

Connectedlight have worked for ETS designing and supplying lighting systems that deliver full turnkey projects repeatedly building up a valued trust between the companies.... Read More

Simon Jeanes - Contracts Manager - ETS Group -

Connected Light have always stepped up to the challenges of providing lighting solutions to meet their clients’ needs. Their dedicated team provide sound solutions for all challenging life science and industrial environments.... Read More

UKHSA - senior project management team -

AVERAGE ENERGY SAVING
60%
AVERAGE RETURN ON INVESTMENT
3 Years
REDUCTION OF MAINTENANCE COST
250%

Celebrating 40 Years of Connected Light: From 1985 to Today

Celebrating 40 Years of Connected Light

On 5 September 1985, Specialist Lighting Services (UK) Limited began its journey in Bristol as a small supplier of lamps and control gear. Forty years later, the business – now known as Connected Light – is proud to mark an anniversary that reflects both its heritage and its future. From those early days supplying components to its current role as a nationwide provider of compliant lighting design and full project delivery, the company has gone from strength to strength.

This milestone is not only about looking back, but also about recognising the passion and dedication of the team who continue to drive Connected Light forward. Every project, whether in heritage, healthcare, industry or education, reflects the same commitment to quality, innovation and client satisfaction that has guided the company since day one.

1985 Beginnings: Specialist Lighting Components

When Connected Light first opened its doors in 1985, the focus was on supplying lamps, control gear and specialist lighting components. It was a time when the industry was rapidly shifting from traditional fluorescent and incandescent technologies towards more efficient solutions, and the company carved out its place as a reliable partner for those who needed dependable products delivered with technical knowledge.

From the outset, the business was more than just a distributor. By offering advice and support alongside components, it built early trust with contractors, maintenance teams and site managers who valued both the quality of the products and the expertise that came with them. These first steps created the foundations for future growth into projects that demanded not only equipment, but also end-to-end lighting design, installation and compliance expertise.

From Supplying Products to Delivering Services

By the early 2000s, the company had outgrown its role as a component supplier and was ready to take on a new identity. The rebrand to Lighting Services reflected a decisive shift from product distribution to service-led expertise. This was the period when in-house lighting design engineers became central to the business, allowing the team to support clients not just with equipment, but with tailored, compliant solutions that could be delivered on site.

The expansion into design and project management opened the door to larger and more complex commissions. Heritage properties, healthcare facilities, commercial offices and public spaces began to feature more prominently in the company’s portfolio. Clients valued the ability to work with a partner who could handle both the technical demands of compliance and the creative aspects of design.

These years were also about laying the groundwork for the future. The skills, processes and reputation established during the Lighting Services era provided the foundation for the business to take the next step: positioning itself as a nationwide provider of complete lighting design and project delivery solutions.

A Connected Approach to Lighting

In 2017, the business entered its next chapter with a new identity: Connected Light. This change was more than just a new name – it captured the company’s commitment to delivering fully integrated solutions, where design, technology and installation work seamlessly together.

This era has been defined by a focus on turnkey project delivery. Clients now benefit from end-to-end support, from concept and design through to commissioning and ongoing service. At the same time, Connected Light has embraced advances in smart controls, wireless systems and sustainable technologies, positioning itself at the forefront of modern lighting practice.

From its Bristol base, the company now works nationwide, trusted to deliver projects across heritage, healthcare, commercial and education sectors. Whether designing sensitive upgrades for historic properties or introducing human-centric lighting into hospitals and workplaces, Connected Light has demonstrated its ability to combine innovation with care – a balance that continues to define its reputation today.

Building Enduring Client Relationships

Across every stage of its journey, one theme has remained constant: the importance of strong client partnerships. From the early days of supplying components to today’s complex design and delivery projects, Connected Light has always prioritised trust, reliability and clear communication. This approach has resulted in long-standing relationships with some of the UK’s most recognisable organisations, including the Royal Automobile Club (RAC), the National Health Service (NHS), the Ministry of Defence (MOD), the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Skanska UK, CBRE Group, and BAM Construct UK.

These are more than just contracts. They are collaborations built over time, where Connected Light has shown an ability to adapt, listen and deliver against unique challenges. Whether modernising a hospital ward, upgrading lighting in sensitive heritage settings, or delivering large-scale energy-saving solutions, clients know they can rely on consistent quality. Many of these stories are captured in the company’s portfolio of projects, which demonstrate how trusted partnerships have shaped its reputation for excellence.

Projects That Defined the Journey

The evolution of Connected Light is best understood through the projects that have shaped its reputation. Each milestone reflects not only technical achievement but also the ability to adapt to new technologies, industries and client needs.

In heritage, a longstanding partnership with the National Trust marked a turning point in 2010 with the major switch to LED lighting across hundreds of properties. Sensitive designs preserved historic character while delivering sustainable savings. At the Reform Club on Pall Mall, discreet LED systems were introduced to enhance the ambiance of one of London’s most prestigious private members’ clubs, balancing heritage integrity with modern performance.

Healthcare has also been central to the Connected Light story. At the Southmead Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), human-centric lighting and wireless controls were installed to support patients, staff and families in one of the most sensitive environments imaginable. At the Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, interactive Casambi smart controls brought new life to its iconic external sculpture, transforming it into a local landmark feature. Meanwhile, work with the St Monica Trust delivered energy and maintenance savings that improved both the quality of light and the sustainability of its facilities.

Corporate and industrial projects highlighted the company’s ability to deliver measurable results at scale. At the (RAC) headquarters, a turnkey LED upgrade achieved an 85% reduction in energy use with a two-year payback period. The programme with the McColl’s Retail Group saw more than 1,200 convenience stores upgraded across the UK, while at Integrity Print, a compliance-led redesign reduced costs and improved efficiency in a demanding industrial setting.

The University of the West of England (UWE) has been a long-term partner, with projects across lecture theatres, sports facilities and enterprise spaces. Highlights include the UWE Foundry, where high-efficiency LED and smart controls created an industrial-inspired learning environment; the Centre for Sport, which achieved annual savings of £24,000; and the lecture theatres, where centralised emergency lighting systems delivered £100,000 in annual maintenance savings.

In the world of sport, Ashton Gate Stadium stands out as a landmark project. Connected Light supported both the stadium’s sports retail outlet and its main arena, delivering compliant emergency lighting, reduced maintenance costs and an enhanced atmosphere for fans and visitors.

Finally, the company’s work with Bristol institutions demonstrates its deep local roots. From supporting Diana Porter Contemporary Jewellery with specialist lighting for her very first shop, to delivering a heritage-sensitive LED upgrade at the Clifton Lido, these projects highlight Connected Light’s ability to support both independent businesses and iconic community spaces.

Together, these defining projects capture the company’s journey – from technical problem-solving and compliance expertise to large-scale rollouts and heritage-sensitive design. Each one has contributed to the reputation Connected Light holds today: a trusted partner capable of delivering lighting solutions that combine innovation, efficiency and care.

Our People, Our Passion

Behind every project are the people who make it possible. Connected Light’s team of designers, engineers, project managers and installers bring both expertise and enthusiasm to their work. Many have been with the business for years, helping to shape its culture of collaboration and problem-solving. For them, lighting is more than a technical challenge – it is about creating environments that support people, protect heritage and improve the way spaces are experienced.

The team’s dedication is also reflected in the relationships they build with clients. Whether delivering a complex healthcare installation or advising on sensitive heritage upgrades, their approach is consistent: listen carefully, design thoughtfully and deliver with precision. It is this passion for excellence that continues to drive Connected Light forward, ensuring every project is completed with the same care and commitment that defined the company’s beginnings.

Working Alongside Trusted Partners and Looking Ahead

Part of Connected Light’s strength lies in the partnerships it has built with leading lighting brands such as Casambi, Signify and BEGA. These collaborations keep the company at the forefront of innovation, ensuring every project benefits from the latest in smart controls, wireless systems and sustainable technology. By combining trusted global products with in-house expertise, Connected Light is able to offer solutions that meet both the creative and compliance needs of its clients.

Looking ahead, the company is focused on the future of lighting – from sustainability and energy efficiency to human-centric design and digital connectivity. As projects grow more complex, Connected Light’s commitment to innovation, collaboration and care will remain its guiding principles.

As the business celebrates its 40th anniversary, the focus is as much on the next chapter as it is on the past. With a dedicated team, valued clients and trusted partners, Connected Light is well placed to continue delivering lighting solutions that improve spaces and enrich lives across the UK for many years to come.

Related Articles

As a valued partner, Connected Light has consistently demonstrated their commitment to delivering sizable projects of lighting controls into various industries, including blue chip clients, retail, and hospitality.... Read More

Owen Basara-Hamilton - UK Sales Manager - Casambi Technologies OY -

As a member of BS 5266 I am so excited to see such suitable, diligent, compliant processing from Connected Light. BS 5266 pt. 1 is a Code of practice for the emergency lighting of premises.... Read More

Ian Watts - CIBSE Trainer, Convener of BS5266 committee board and ICEL Council -

The service Connected Light offer to us is invaluable. They have access to a wide range of manufacturers and luminaires that enhance any lighting design, provide the back-up calculations, control philosophy and on-site commissioning.... Read More

Nick Hare - Director of Electrical Services - Brunel Integrated Services Ltd -

AVERAGE ENERGY SAVING
60%
AVERAGE RETURN ON INVESTMENT
3 Years
REDUCTION OF MAINTENANCE COST
250%

Fluorescent Lighting Ban: A UK Business Guide to Smarter LED Upgrades

The Fluorescent Phase-Out Has Begun

 

If your business still relies on fluorescent tubes, the clock is ticking. With the UK’s phased ban on compact fluorescent (CFL), T5 and T8 lamps now in full effect, thousands of companies are being forced to consider urgent lighting upgrades. Stock is dwindling fast, prices are climbing, and compatibility issues are causing confusion – particularly for those trying to find a quick fix online.

But there’s no need to panic. While it’s true that fluorescent tubes are banned from manufacture and import in the UK, that doesn’t mean you should rush into the first LED replacement you find. Making the wrong lighting choice can be costly – both financially and operationally.

At Connected Light, we help organisations upgrade their lighting with confidence. From assessing your site and reviewing control systems to selecting efficient, aesthetic and long-term solutions, we’re here to ensure you only upgrade once – and get it right the first time.

What’s Banned, and When?

 

The phase-out of fluorescent lighting in the UK is no longer just on the horizon – it’s already here. As of July 2025, nearly all major categories of fluorescent lighting are banned from manufacture and import under the UK’s implementation of the RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) Directive. This legislation targets mercury-based lamps and aligns with broader European efforts to transition towards safer, more sustainable lighting.

Here’s a recap of the key milestones:

  • September 2023: Ban on T8 linear lamps (2ft, 4ft, 5ft)

  • February 2024: Ban on compact fluorescent non-integrated (CFLni) and T5 lamps

  • February 2025: Additional restrictions on long-life CFLs and high-mercury circular tubes, such as T9s

While some existing stock may still be circulating, availability is now severely limited and pricing is volatile. Businesses that have yet to upgrade are finding it increasingly difficult to source reliable replacements – often resorting to expensive or incompatible short-term solutions.

As Buildings.com highlighted, this wave of change is being felt across the UK and EU alike – making long-term planning and LED upgrades more important than ever.

Why It’s Happening: Sustainability & Safety

 

So why are fluorescent tubes and CFL bulbs being banned? In short: environmental risk and outdated efficiency. Fluorescent lamps contain mercury – a toxic heavy metal that can be dangerous if broken or improperly disposed of. Even though they’re safe during normal use, broken lamps can contaminate indoor environments or landfill sites, creating lasting harm.

The UK’s lighting regulations are now aligned with wider European legislation to remove mercury from all new lamps, in accordance with the RoHS Directive. This marks a significant shift towards safer, more sustainable lighting options – with LED leading the way.

In addition, this ban is part of the UK’s broader sustainability strategy. Replacing older fluorescent systems with LED technology can cut energy consumption dramatically. According to GOV.UK, switching to LEDs is expected to reduce carbon emissions by over 1.25 million tonnes annually – the equivalent of removing more than 500,000 cars from the road.

For businesses, this is both a challenge and an opportunity: to improve efficiency, reduce running costs, and make responsible upgrades that align with long-term carbon and compliance goals.

“It’s about more than just compliance – lighting upgrades are now a core part of how businesses reduce energy, improve safety and futureproof their spaces.” Matt Holway, Director, Connected Light

Fluorescent Lighting Alternatives: It’s Not Just LEDs

 

With fluorescent tubes banned and many businesses scrambling to replace outdated fittings, LED might seem like the obvious solution – and in most cases, it is. But not all LED options are created equal, and the best alternative for your business depends on a range of factors beyond just energy savings.

Some organisations opt for plug-and-play LED tubes, designed to fit directly into existing fluorescent fixtures. While these can offer a fast fix, they often result in lower efficiency, reduced light quality, and compatibility issues with legacy control systems. Worse, they may not comply with current wiring safety standards, particularly in older luminaires.

A smarter long-term option is a purpose-designed LED lighting system, tailored to your space, budget and operational needs. These can include tunable white, low-glare, and sensor-integrated luminaires that significantly outperform retrofits – especially in offices, schools, healthcare facilities and commercial buildings.

At Connected Light, we design and deliver custom lighting solutions that balance performance, aesthetics and compliance – without cutting corners. And with control systems that minimise disruption, you can modernise without unnecessary rewiring or visual impact.

Common Mistakes When Upgrading

 

In the rush to meet compliance or simply “keep the lights on,” many businesses fall into avoidable traps when replacing banned fluorescent lighting. The most common mistake? Buying generic LED tubes online or in bulk – often without confirming whether they’ll work with existing wiring or control systems.

Some businesses attempt a like-for-like swap, only to discover that plug-in LEDs flicker, underperform, or require expensive rewiring to function correctly. Others install mismatched fittings that clash with interior design or create poor visual conditions for employees and customers.

It’s also common to overlook lighting controls altogether. For example, older fluorescent systems with outdated ballasts or time-switch panels are rarely compatible with modern wireless controls, which offer dynamic zoning, dimming and automation. Retaining the wrong control infrastructure can quickly negate the benefits of your LED upgrade.

Instead of rushing, the best approach is to review your site holistically. That includes evaluating the current luminaires, control systems, lighting needs, and energy goals.

We’ve helped clients across sectors avoid costly missteps – from multi-site commercial offices to healthcare facilities – by building systems that are flexible, future-ready and visually appropriate. Explore some of our recent projects to see what’s possible with the right guidance.

Connected Light’s Process: How We Help You Upgrade Smarter

 

At Connected Light, we understand that no two lighting upgrades are the same. That’s why our approach goes beyond simply replacing fluorescent tubes with LEDs – we deliver strategic lighting solutions that meet your technical, aesthetic and operational needs.

It all begins with a conversation. Our team conducts a site assessment to understand your building’s current lighting infrastructure, control systems, usage patterns and environmental challenges. Whether you’re managing a single facility or a multi-site portfolio, we evaluate everything from emergency lighting compliance to energy reduction targets.

We then recommend a bespoke upgrade path – this might involve LED luminaires that preserve architectural intent, wireless control systems that eliminate the need for rewiring, or dynamic lighting schemes that enhance productivity, comfort and well-being.

Crucially, we align our lighting proposals with your budget, brand and sustainability goals. From high-performance options for demanding commercial environments to discreet, low-energy solutions for heritage spaces, we source the right products from trusted manufacturers.

You’ll find our solutions working effectively across a wide range of sectors, from office environments to specialist healthcare facilities. In every case, we prioritise longevity, flexibility and ease of maintenance – ensuring your upgrade pays off for years to come.

Explore our full range of renewable lighting solutions to see how we make lighting smarter, cleaner and simpler.

“No two lighting upgrades are the same – our job is to guide clients through the noise and deliver a solution that works for their space, now and in the future.” Matt Holway, Director, Connected Light

Long-Term Value: Don’t Pay Twice

 

When fluorescent lighting bans were first introduced, many organisations opted for the cheapest solution available – often bulk-bought LED tubes fitted into legacy fixtures. But now, those same businesses are facing a second wave of upgrades, due to performance issues, compatibility failures or outdated controls.

It’s a scenario we see far too often: trying to save money in the short term ends up costing more in the long run. Quick fixes may tick the compliance box for now, but without futureproofing, they risk becoming obsolete just as fast as the fluorescent systems they replaced.

That’s why we encourage clients to take a long-term view of lighting investment. A professionally designed LED upgrade – with appropriate control systems, high-quality luminaires and efficient planning – typically delivers a return on investment in 2–3 years through reduced energy bills and maintenance costs alone.

Better still, it reduces disruption and ensures you won’t be forced into another lighting overhaul in just a few years’ time. With Connected Light, you can move forward confidently – knowing your lighting is compliant, efficient, and built to last.

Summary & Call to Action

 

The fluorescent lighting ban is now fully in effect – but that doesn’t mean your business needs to rush into a costly or short-sighted upgrade. Taking time to understand your options, assess your existing setup, and choose a smart, future-ready solution is the best way to avoid wasted spend and poor performance.

At Connected Light, we’re helping businesses across the UK transition from banned fluorescent systems to intelligent, high-efficiency lighting built for the long term.

Whether you’re looking to improve sustainability, reduce operating costs, or modernise your workplace, our team is ready to guide you.

Get in touch today to start your upgrade journey with confidence.

Related Articles

The RUH have a close working relationship with Connected Light, working on many projects, having provided equipment and technological advice for a large £1.4 million upgrade from fluorescent LED across the hospital estate.... Read More

Estates Officer – RUH, Bath -

Connectedlight have worked for ETS designing and supplying lighting systems that deliver full turnkey projects repeatedly building up a valued trust between the companies.... Read More

Simon Jeanes - Contracts Manager - ETS Group -

Connected Light have always stepped up to the challenges of providing lighting solutions to meet their clients’ needs. Their dedicated team provide sound solutions for all challenging life science and industrial environments.... Read More

UKHSA - senior project management team -

AVERAGE ENERGY SAVING
60%
AVERAGE RETURN ON INVESTMENT
3 Years
REDUCTION OF MAINTENANCE COST
250%

Why Bat Friendly Lighting Matters: Protecting Wildlife Through Smarter Environmental Lighting Design

Lighting the Night, Protecting the Wild

 

Artificial lighting has transformed our night-time environments – improving safety, extending activity hours, and enhancing aesthetics in outdoor spaces. But as our towns and cities grow brighter, a lesser-known cost is emerging: disruption to nocturnal wildlife, especially bats. In the UK, bats play a critical role in insect control and biodiversity, yet their survival is increasingly threatened by excessive and poorly designed lighting.

As lighting designers, specifiers, and consultants, it’s essential to understand how bat friendly lighting can protect sensitive ecosystems while still meeting functional and aesthetic requirements. This article explores the ecological impact of light pollution, outlines best practices for wildlife friendly lighting, and shows how Connected Light delivers smarter, low-impact lighting for even the most sensitive environments – including heritage and listed buildings.

Why Bats and Lighting in the UK Are a Concern

The UK is home to 18 species of bats – 17 of which breed here – making them an integral part of our native ecosystem. As nocturnal animals, bats depend on darkness to forage, navigate, and avoid predators. But with increasing development and the spread of artificial lighting into rural and suburban areas, their habitats are under constant threat.

The issue of bats and lighting in the UK is now well documented. According to the Bat Conservation Trust, artificial light falling near roosts or commuting corridors can delay emergence, reduce foraging time, or even lead to complete roost abandonment. For slower-flying species like lesser horseshoes and Myotis bats, lit areas become barriers, fragmenting feeding grounds and reducing their ability to survive.

“You can’t retrofit biodiversity. Once the habitat is disrupted, it’s often gone for good. That’s why low-impact, ecologically sensitive lighting should be considered at the very start of any outdoor project,” says Matt Holway, Director at Connected Light.

Legally, all UK bat species and their roosts are protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 and the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010. Any outdoor lighting design near known or potential roosting sites must comply – both ethically and lawfully.

The Impact of Artificial Light on Bats

The growth of Artificial Light at Night (ALAN) has been dramatic – rising by nearly 50% in the past three decades. While the benefits of well-designed exterior lighting are clear, its ecological downsides are becoming harder to ignore. Bats are particularly sensitive, and the effects of inappropriate lighting can be severe.

Exposure to artificial lighting interferes with natural activity cycles. It delays emergence from roosts, shortens foraging periods, and increases the risk of predation. Some species avoid lit areas altogether, forcing them into poorer quality habitats. Even faster species like pipistrelles may be lured to streetlights where insects gather – only to become easier targets for birds of prey.

The science is clear. A 2021 study in ScienceDirect found that short-wavelength light, particularly blue and white LEDs, can significantly reduce bat activity. By contrast, amber or warm-white light (below 2700K) has a far less disruptive effect – making it a central consideration in bat friendly lighting strategies.

These findings reinforce the importance of low impact lighting design – where the right spectrum, intensity, timing, and direction of light are used to minimise ecological disturbance. It’s not about switching off entirely; it’s about lighting with care and intent.

Designing with Bats in Mind: Practical Considerations

Whether you’re lighting a park trail, a car park, or the exterior of a listed building, thoughtful design can make a measurable difference. Here are five key ways to reduce impact while still achieving your lighting goals:

  1. Light only where needed – Avoid blanket illumination. Every additional light source introduces ecological risk, so lighting schemes should be carefully scoped to focus only on required paths, entrances, and gathering areas. Using cut-off optics or shielded luminaires ensures the beam is directed precisely where it’s needed – reducing waste and preventing unintended consequences for wildlife.
  2. Use warm or amber tones – Not all light is equal. LEDs with a correlated colour temperature (CCT) of 2700K or lower are significantly less disruptive to nocturnal wildlife, including bats. These warmer hues are less likely to interfere with natural foraging or commuting behaviour and are now widely available in street and architectural lighting products designed for low impact lighting schemes.
  3. Minimise light spill – Light trespass into dark corridors, hedgerows, watercourses or tree canopies can fragment habitat and reduce foraging areas. Beam angles, mounting height, and luminaire selection should all be chosen to tightly control spread. Spill shields or louvres can help in situations where physical layout makes aiming more challenging.
  4. Smart control systems – Reducing intensity and operating time is just as important as spectrum. Incorporating presence detection, timers, dimmers, or astronomical clocks ensures light is only present when truly needed. This limits ecological disturbance during peak bat activity (typically 30 minutes after sunset through to the early hours).
  5. Collaborate early – If bat populations are suspected or confirmed on site, bring in ecological consultants early in the planning process. Understanding roost locations, foraging grounds, and commuting routes helps inform a truly bat friendly lighting layout – one that meets both environmental and operational needs.

For real-world examples of sensitive lighting in action, visit our project portfolio

Balancing Function and Ecology in Outdoor Lighting

It’s a common misconception that sustainable lighting comes at the expense of performance. In reality, well-designed bat friendly lighting can meet both ecological and functional needs – particularly when expert guidance is applied from the outset.

At Connected Light, we don’t treat conservation as a constraint. We see it as part of responsible design. Whether you’re illuminating a heritage estate, upgrading a civic space, or designing for planning compliance, it’s possible to achieve high-quality results that also respect the natural environment.

“Some of our best projects have been the most challenging. When you’re lighting around protected species or in designated landscapes, you’re forced to think creatively – and that’s where great design happens,” says Matt Holway, Director at Connected Light.

A notable example includes the Two Tunnels Greenway near Bath – a sensitive heritage and ecology-led scheme involving extensive underground cycle and pedestrian routes. The project, delivered by Connected Light, involved detailed planning to reduce disruption to bat populations within the tunnels and surrounding environment – proving that elegant, safe lighting and wildlife protection can go hand in hand.

Learn more about our values and team on the About Us page.

Get Support with Bat Friendly Lighting Design

From listed buildings to rural developments, bat friendly lighting is no longer just a “nice to have” – it’s an essential part of modern, sustainable design. Whether you’re navigating planning conditions, working in ecologically sensitive zones, or responding to client concerns about biodiversity, early engagement with the right specialists is key.

Connected Light supports lighting designers, M&E consultants, contractors, and architects with end-to-end guidance on ecologically responsible schemes. Our team can advise on spectrum, controls, fixture selection, and lighting layouts that comply with legislation and best practice – all while enhancing the usability and appearance of your site

If you’re working on a project where wildlife friendly lighting is a factor, don’t leave it to chance. Contact us to ensure your lighting meets both environmental and performance objectives.

Related Articles

As a member of BS 5266 I am so excited to see such suitable, diligent, compliant processing from Connected Light. BS 5266 pt. 1 is a Code of practice for the emergency lighting of premises.... Read More

Ian Watts - CIBSE Trainer, Convener of BS5266 committee board and ICEL Council -

The RUH have a close working relationship with Connected Light, working on many projects, having provided equipment and technological advice for a large £1.4 million upgrade from fluorescent LED across the hospital estate.... Read More

Estates Officer – RUH, Bath -

The service Connected Light offer to us is invaluable. They have access to a wide range of manufacturers and luminaires that enhance any lighting design, provide the back-up calculations, control philosophy and on-site commissioning.... Read More

Nick Hare - Director of Electrical Services - Brunel Integrated Services Ltd -

AVERAGE ENERGY SAVING
60%
AVERAGE RETURN ON INVESTMENT
3 Years
REDUCTION OF MAINTENANCE COST
250%

Connected Light Achieves Enhanced ISO 9001 Certification with UKAS-Accredited Quality Management System

Connected Light is proud to announce its certification to ISO 9001 – the internationally recognised standard for quality management. This achievement reflects the company’s ongoing commitment to excellence, professionalism, and continual improvement across all areas of operation.

To reach this milestone, the Connected Light team developed and implemented a brand-new quality management system, tailored specifically to support the company’s internal processes and high service standards. Unlike the previous system, this new approach is now fully UKAS accredited – providing added assurance for clients, partners, and project stakeholders.

Director Matt Holway commented:
“Achieving ISO 9001 certification demonstrates our continued drive to deliver best-in-class lighting control solutions. We’ve worked hard to create a management system that genuinely supports how we work – not just a box-ticking exercise, but a meaningful framework that helps us improve, stay compliant, and add value for our clients.”

This certification would not have been possible without the expert support of Andy Young from SQE Solutions, an independent consultancy specialising in Health & Safety, Quality, and Environmental compliance. Andy played a pivotal role in guiding the Connected Light team through the development of the new system, from gap analysis through to implementation.

Audit and certification were successfully delivered by ACT (A Cube TIC), who conducted both the Stage 1 and Stage 2 assessments and formally certified Connected Light to ISO 9001.

“We’d like to extend our thanks to Andy and the team at ACT for their professionalism and support throughout this process,” added Holway. “This accreditation is an important step in our growth, and we’re excited to build on this as we continue working across high-profile projects nationwide.”

Connected Light provides intelligent lighting control solutions across commercial, industrial, education, heritage, and specialist sectors. Learn more at connectedlight.co.uk.

Related Articles

The RUH have a close working relationship with Connected Light, working on many projects, having provided equipment and technological advice for a large £1.4 million upgrade from fluorescent LED across the hospital estate.... Read More

Estates Officer – RUH, Bath -

As a long-standing partner of ConnectedLight, Signify Commercial UKI is proud to be associated with such an adaptable and innovative company. ConnectedLight's expertise in lighting services,... Read More

Ella Stuart - Customer Order Manager - Signify -

I have recently been working with Connected Light on a number of Lifecycle projects in the education sector and they have been great to work with, from conception and scoping works through to the delivery and installation.... Read More

Dani Timbrell - Facilities Management Project Manager -